Igor Kromin |   Consultant. Coder. Blogger. Tinkerer. Gamer.

NOTE: This article is 3 years or older so its information may no longer be relevant. Read on at your own discretion! Comments for this article have automatically been locked, refer to the FAQ for more details.
I've written previously about fixing HL7 CDA schema compilation with XJC, now that I've been looking at FHIR it seems that there are name collisions in that schema too. The actual problem arises out of the W3C XHTML 1.0 Schema and not the FHIR schema per se.

This is the kind of error that XJC throws whenever trying to compile the FHIR schema:
 XJC Error
Error while parsing schema(s).Location [ fhir-xhtml.xsd{48,2902}].
com.sun.istack.SAXParseException2; systemId: fhir-xhtml.xsd; lineNumber: 48; columnNumber: 2902; Property "Lang" is already defined. Use <jaxb:property> to resolve this conflict.


Ok so that says that "Lang" is already defined and looking at that part of the XSD reveals this...
 XSD
<xs:attributeGroup name="i18n">
<xs:attribute name="lang" type="LanguageCode"/>
<xs:attribute ref="xml:lang"/>
...


It's pretty obvious why XJC would complain. There's a name collisions between the xml:lang reference and the lang attribute, both would get mapped to a variable named 'lang' in the generated Java code.

To fix it, it's just a matter of telling XJC to rename the xml:lang reference to 'xmlLang' when generating Java code while leaving the lang attribute as is. The following bindings would be suitable, see my CDA article linked above for the full binding file definition:
 Bindings
<jaxb:bindings schemaLocation="http://hl7.org/fhir/2016May/fhir-xhtml.xsd">
<jaxb:bindings node="//xs:attributeGroup[@name='i18n']/xs:attribute[@ref='xml:lang']">
<jaxb:property name="xmlLang"/>
</jaxb:bindings>
<jaxb:bindings node="//xs:element[@name='bdo']/xs:complexType/xs:complexContent/xs:extension/xs:attribute[@ref='xml:lang']">
<jaxb:property name="xmlLang"/>
</jaxb:bindings>
</jaxb:bindings>


Here's an answer from StackOverlow that is similar in nature and covers it in more detail.



Then it's just a matter of telling XJC that you want to use a binding file and the FHIR schema should compile!

-i

Skip down to comments...
A quick disclaimer...

Although I put in a great effort into researching all the topics I cover, mistakes can happen. If you spot something out of place, please do let me know.

All content and opinions expressed on this Blog are my own and do not represent the opinions of my employer (Oracle). Use of any information contained in this blog post/article is subject to this disclaimer.
 
comments powered by Disqus
Other posts you may like...